Latest posts for the topic "Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?"

Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

philip.breau — GMT

Hello Everyone, We've had a few inquiries into supporting Portlets and are wondering if Portlets are on anybody else's radar. Is anyone else out there using Portlets, and if so, what implementations have you evaluated or have decided on? Tell us your thoughts. Thanks, Philip

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

mores — GMT

Yes, I would like to use ICEfaces with portlets. I see that Preliminary Portal support has been achieved in version 1.5. ( http://icefaces.org/docs/v1_5/ReleaseNotes.html ) Can someone make available a Hello World JSR 168 ice face ?

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

ysatyakrishna — GMT

Hi, I'm trying to use Liferay portlet framework with icefaces 1.5.0, but no luck as of now. I think components are not completely support Portlets? Is that true? Satya

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

philip.breau — GMT

Hi Satya, There's preliminary support for portals in ICEfaces 1.5. I'm not sure about how well it will work with Liferay as I don't think that's been tested yet. But a few configuration details that might help you: 1) for tomcat set emptySessionPath="true" so that the portlet can share the session with its BlockingServlet http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/http.html 2) configure WEB-INF/portlet.xml so that PersitentFacesPortlet is used Some things that I believe are still to be resolved: - navigation is not working within portlets - "connection lost" cannot put a modal barrier over the whole page as there are multiple portlets on that page Thanks, Philip

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

jarkko — GMT

Yes we do ;) Currently we've Liferay 4.0.2 running nicely with Seam/MyFaces/Facelets and we're trying to figure how to use Icefaces also.

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

Stephane — GMT

Yes, we'd also like to have portlet support! One of our requirements in choosing a framework was that we could have the ability to create portlets in the near future. Regards, Steph

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

philip.breau — GMT

Hi Stephane, Thanks for the feedback. Have you guys chosen any Portal framework yet? Philip

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

Stephane — GMT

Hi, Actually, that's a loaded question right now. I'm looking at either a custom and extremely lightweight solution with very limited functionality versus a full BEA portal solution. At least that's my understanding right now. Regards, Steph

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

kbaghdady — GMT

Hi guys, We actually almost settled on using liferay portal ,but we were looking for the compatibility with ICEFaces ,It will be a great addition if we can use ICEfaces with the portal.. Thanks, Karim El-Baghdady

Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

erron — GMT

another +1 for portlet integration

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

philip.breau — GMT

Thanks erron, and did you have any preferred portal implementation? Philip

Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

erron — GMT

We are using Liferay.

Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

erron — GMT

Out of curiosity, has anyone tried using the jsf portlet bridge with ICEfaces? Thanks

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

hurzeler — GMT

Yes we would like to use icefaces with jboss-portal. However we can not do that as long as the navigation is not working. What is your timeframe for the portlet navigation/pageflow? Tha

Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

vitozabal — GMT

I am looking forward to use Ice Faces with jboss portal 2.6 DR

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

alex311 — GMT

I want to use icefaces with websphere portal 6. (standard jsr-168, not ibm portlets)

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

dsgfh — GMT

G'day. We're doing a Sun Portal Server implementation for a large corp at the moment & would love JSR-168 support from ICEFaces. I'd have it sold to my client in an instant.

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

aoathout — GMT

We would like to use ICEfaces with Liferay 4.2.1. We have the example portlet that was posted in another thread (http://www.icefaces.org/JForum/posts/list/3155.page) working but right now the show stopper is no navigation support? Any idea if/when this is being addressed or if anybody has come up with a patch to make this work?

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

philip.breau — GMT

Sorry, we don't have a patch for this yet, but we are working on it, and should have an update on this issue shortly. We realize it's a fundamental bug and view this as a major priority. Thanks, Philip

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

jgrange — GMT

Would very much like to use ICEfaces in oracle portal 1.4. Unfortunately, the included resources don't appear to be using encodeURL, so (as our WSRP container is on a different machine to portal) none of the resources are being included. (certainly in ICEfaces 1.5.2) Brilliant framework - add my vote to the pile

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

aigloss — GMT

what do you mean exactly when saying 'Navigation doesn't work'?

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

jarkko — GMT

Icefaces 1.5.3 (from Seam Icefaces example), works quite nice! Just one thing I still needed to do is to combine the two icefaces javascript files (cat ice-extras.js >> icefaces-d2d.js) to get drag-n-drop to work. Icefaces wasn't able to find Draggable (and the other relevant js objects) due to some weird thing when running inside portlet. Maybe the automatic inclusion of icefaces-extra.js just doesn't work when running in portlet mode (Liferay 4.2.0).

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

maguri — GMT

I would like very much (and need to) work with JBoss and/or LifeRay portals. Can I agree with my client to use IceFaces and one of the mentioned portals?

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

philip.breau — GMT

Liferay is our first priority for Portal support. That's probably going to be fully completed by ICEfaces 1.6.1. Check out this thread: http://www.icefaces.org/JForum/posts/list/3155.page Philip

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

bionut — GMT

Do you have support for WebLogic portal container on your roadmap? We have a new project starting up which is scheduled for deployment as a WebLogic portlet and we would like to use ICEFaces for that project. Thanks, Greg

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

philip.breau — GMT

Hi Greg, Our first 2 targets are Liferay and JBoss Portal. After that we have no set priority. It will most likely depend on client demand which we'll review after we've completed Liferay and JBoss support, at which time we'll be better able to judge the extent of work required for supporting WebLogic. Philip

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

jgrange — GMT

IMHO targetting a WSRP environment would probably provide some useful groundwork for supporting remaining portals (e.g. Oracle)

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

maxi_ng — GMT

I have tried latest liferay and jboss. Jboss works better with icefaces than liferay. with icefaces 1.6 you will need to setup AHS and it works okay. with icefaces 1.7beta will get you some session expired trouble.

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

flyc14 — GMT

maxi_ng wrote:

I have tried latest liferay and jboss. Jboss works better with icefaces than liferay. with icefaces 1.6 you will need to setup AHS and it works okay. with icefaces 1.7beta will get you some session expired trouble.

Hi... Any update on this thread? 1.Is Liferay still the first priority on integration with icefaces, does navigation work now? 2. Or is the integration with JBOSS portal as quoted above better than Liferay? 3. Is there any documentation on how to get to the logged in user principal, in either Liferay or Jboss from within the icefaces webapp. I am in the midst of deciding between JBOSS and Liferay. I've decided on icefaces; would be very helpful if anyone has any pointers on the portal solution. I am inclined to go with JBoss as it has a comparatively larger services company backing it.. while Liferay seems to enjoy a much wider adoption. TIA

Re:Anybody want to use Portlets with ICEfaces?

petar_b — GMT

I am using them as demo for a project. Your support already know about it. My current worries go to liferay, weak documentation, no motivation to support, etc...., it's not bad product, but suport sucks. database is not relational. What happens with 168 and 268 standards, supported ? Keep up good work ! Petar Banicevic